Metabolic And Physiological potentiaL Evaluator

for gene mapping to the KEGG functional modules and calculation of module completion ratio (MCR)
[Announcement] MAPLE service is discontinued at the end of February, 2019.

The latest version of MAPLE is available at JAMSTEC.


MAPLE (Metabolic And Physiological potentiaL Evaluator) is an automatic system for mapping genes in an individual genome and metagenome to the functional module and for calculating the module completion ratio (MCR) in each functional module defined by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). The MCR calculation is performed based on a Boolean algebra-like equation defined by KEGG to each module. MAPLE first assigns a KO identifier (ID) to the query gene using KAAS, maps the KO-assigned genes to the KEGG functional modules, and calculates the MCR of each functional module and its abundance when the module is complete. There are two methods for KO assignment by KAAS: bidirectional best hit (BBH) and single-directional best hit (SBH). The BBH method is suitable for complete gene sets identified in complete genomes or contigs, while the SBH method is mainly for short-read sequences in metagenomes or incomplete genomes.

The result page displays the MCR, abundance of each KEGG module and the taxonomic information of the KO-assigned genes mapped to the module along with a mapping pattern. Also, a module list sharing the same KOs is shown. The results of KO assignment by KAAS, taxonomic information of the genes mapped to the KEGG modules, and calculated MCRs are downloadable in an Excel format. MAPLE can display the results of comparative analyses of mapping patterns, MCR results, and abundance of complete modules between different metagenomic samples. Generally, it is expected that the MCR is linked to the likelihood that the organisms perform the physiological function corresponding to the module. However, when the KOs used for a module are shared with the other modules, the MCR does not necessarily reflect the working probability of each functional module. To evaluate the working probability of the physiological function in the incomplete modules, we proposed the Q-value for determining the significance of module completeness. The Q-value, which implies the probability that a reaction module is identified by chance, is calculated based on the statistics of the sequence similarity score and KO abundance using the concept of multiple testing corrections according to the Boolean algebra-like equations.

Metagenome or Partial Genome Sequences

KO assignment to short-read sequences (400–500 nt) produced by a high-throughput DNA sequencer is performed by KAAS using the single-directional best-hit (SBH) method. Query sequences must be translated into amino acid (aa) sequences before submission, and sequences longer than 100 aa are recommended for accurate KO assignment.

Complete or Draft Genome Sequences

KO assignment for complete gene sets that were identified in the complete genome or contigs is performed by KAAS using the bidirectional best-hit (BBH) method.

Comparison of the KEGG‐Annotated Genomes

Comparison of KEGG-annotated genomes without user's jobs is also possible and does not require an e-mail address.

KEGG Data used in MAPLE

MAPLE uses the following KEGG GENES and MODULE databases:


Nov. 25 2016:MAPLE-2.3.0 was launched (the latest version including several new functions).
July 3 2016:A paper for MAPLE 2.1.0 was published on line of DNA Research
Nov. 20 2015:MAPLE-2.1.0 was launched.
Dec. 24 2014:MAPLE-2.0.0 was launched (the latest version including several new features).
Jan. 15 2014:The MCR calculation method was modified to accommodate new modules.
Dec. 1 2013:The current web site was launched.

Example of Results

Mapping genes to the KEGG functional modules

MCR calculation of each KEGG module

Results comparison


  1. Wataru Arai, Takeaki Taniguchi, Susumu Goto, Yuki Moriya, Hideya Uehara, Kazuhiro Takemoto, Hiroyuki Ogataand Hideto Takami. (2018) MAPLE 2.3.0: an improved system for evaluating the functionomes of genomes and metagenomes. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. [PubMed] [DOI]
  2. Takami H., Taniguchi T., Arai W., Takemoto K., Moriya Y. & Goto S. (2016) An automated system for evaluation of the potential functionome: MAPLE version 2.1.0. DNA Res. 23, 467-475 [PubMed] [DNA Res]
  3. Takami H. (2014) New method for comparative functional genomics and metagenomics using KEGG MODULE. Encyclopedia of Metagenomics. K.E. Nelson (ed.), Genes, Genomes and Metagenomes: Basics, Methods, Databases and Tools, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7478-5, Springer New York. pp. 525-539. [Springer]
  4. Takami H., Taniguchi T., Moriya Y., Kuwahara T., Kanehisa M. & Goto S. (2012) Evaluation method for the potential functionome harbored in the genome and metagenome. BMC Genomics. 13, 699
    [PubMed] [BMC Genomics]

Last updated: Last updated: Nov. 25, 2016